R. v. Powley, [2001] 2 C.N.L.R. 291 (Ont. C.A.), aff’g [2000] 2 C.N.L.R. 233 (Ont. Sup. Ct. J.)
Downloads
Description
The Respondents in this case were Metis. They had shot a bull moose for use as their winter meat. They were charged for hunting and possessing a moose without licences contrary to ss. 46 and 47(1) of the Game and Fish Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. G.1. The accused argue that they have a constitutionally protected right to hunt under the Constitution Act, 1982 in s. 35(1).
In collections
- Title
- R. v. Powley, [2001] 2 C.N.L.R. 291 (Ont. C.A.), aff’g [2000] 2 C.N.L.R. 233 (Ont. Sup. Ct. J.)
- Creator
- Subject
- Description
- The Respondents in this case were Metis. They had shot a bull moose for use as their winter meat. They were charged for hunting and possessing a moose without licences contrary to ss. 46 and 47(1) of the Game and Fish Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. G.1. The accused argue that they have a constitutionally protected right to hunt under the Constitution Act, 1982 in s. 35(1).
- Publisher
- Contributor
- ON - Court of Appeal of Ontario, R. (Appellant), Powley, Steve,Powley, Roddy Charles (Respondent)
- Date
- 2000-02-18
- Type
- Format
- Identifier
- legal:587, local: , nation: Metis
- Source
- Language
- Relation
- Coverage
- North America--Canada--Ontario
- Rights