Taku River Tlingit First Nation v. British Columbia (Project Assessment Director), [2005] 1 C.N.L.R.
Downloads
Description
Since 1994, the proponent has sought permission from the British Columbia government to reopen an old mine. During the environmental assessment process under the Environmental Assessment Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.119, access to the mine emerged as a point of contention. The members of the Taku River Tlingit First Nation (TRTFN), who participated in the assessment, objected to the proponent's plan to build a road through their traditional territory. However, after a lengthy process, approval was granted in 1998. In 1999 the TRTFN brought a petition to quash the Ministers' decision to issue the Project Approval Certificate on administrative law grounds and on grounds based on its Aboriginal rights and title. The chambers judge set aside the decision, and the majority of the British Columbia Court of Appeal ([2002] 2 C.N.L.R. 312) dismissed the Province's appeal, finding that the Province had failed to meet its duty to consult with and accommodate the TRTFN. This is the Intervener Factum of the Attorney General of Alberta. Note: The summary has been extracted from Taku River Tlingit First Nation v. British Columbia (Project Assessment Director), [2005] 1 C.N.L.R. 366.
In collections
- Title
- Taku River Tlingit First Nation v. British Columbia (Project Assessment Director), [2005] 1 C.N.L.R.
- Creator
- Subject
- Description
- Since 1994, the proponent has sought permission from the British Columbia government to reopen an old mine. During the environmental assessment process under the Environmental Assessment Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.119, access to the mine emerged as a point of contention. The members of the Taku River Tlingit First Nation (TRTFN), who participated in the assessment, objected to the proponent's plan to build a road through their traditional territory. However, after a lengthy process, approval was granted in 1998. In 1999 the TRTFN brought a petition to quash the Ministers' decision to issue the Project Approval Certificate on administrative law grounds and on grounds based on its Aboriginal rights and title. The chambers judge set aside the decision, and the majority of the British Columbia Court of Appeal ([2002] 2 C.N.L.R. 312) dismissed the Province's appeal, finding that the Province had failed to meet its duty to consult with and accommodate the TRTFN. This is the Intervener Factum of the Attorney General of Alberta. Note: The summary has been extracted from Taku River Tlingit First Nation v. British Columbia (Project Assessment Director), [2005] 1 C.N.L.R. 366.
- Publisher
- Contributor
- CA - Supreme Court of Canada, Council of Forest Industries,First Nations Summit,Business Council of British Columbia,Aggregate Producers Association of BC,British Columbia and Yukon Chamber of Mines,British Columbia Chamber of Commerce,Attorney General of Canada,Attorney General of Quebec,Attorney General of Alberta,British Columbia Wildlife Federation,Mining Association of British Columbia,Doig River First Nation (Intervener), Minister of the Environment, Lands and Parks,Minister of Energy and Mines,Minister Responsible for Northern Development (Appellant), Redfern Resources,Taku River Tlingit First Nation (Respondent)
- Date
- 2003-09-11
- Type
- Format
- Identifier
- legal:761, local: , nation: First Nations
- Source
- Language
- Relation
- Coverage
- North America--Canada--British Columbia
- Rights