R. v. Brertton, [2000] 1 C.N.L.R. 201 (Alta. C.A.), aff’g [1998] 3 C.N.L.R. 122 (Alta. Q.B.)
Downloads
Description
The accused is a member of Treaty 6 and shot a big horn sheep after he had entered a mineral lease area. The accused appeals the decision based on the Badger \visible incompatible use\" test. The accused seeks a remedy that affirms his right to hunt per the NRTA. ( volume 2 of the applcation for leave to appeal)"
In collections
- Title
- R. v. Brertton, [2000] 1 C.N.L.R. 201 (Alta. C.A.), aff’g [1998] 3 C.N.L.R. 122 (Alta. Q.B.)
- Creator
- Subject
- Description
- The accused is a member of Treaty 6 and shot a big horn sheep after he had entered a mineral lease area. The accused appeals the decision based on the Badger \visible incompatible use\" test. The accused seeks a remedy that affirms his right to hunt per the NRTA. ( volume 2 of the applcation for leave to appeal)"
- Publisher
- Contributor
- CA - Supreme Court of Canada, Brertton, Darrell,Cardinal, Cameron,Bull, Samuel Lorne, Jr. (Appellant), R. (In Right of Alberta) (Respondent)
- Date
- 1999-12-10
- Type
- Format
- Identifier
- legal:791, local: , nation: First Nations
- Source
- Language
- Relation
- Coverage
- North America--Canada--Alberta
- Rights