Legal Pleadings
-
- Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
- Whether a Jamaican born immigrant woman with children both in Canada and Jamaica can stay as an immigrant.Baker is a paranoid schizophrenic and is on welfare. Immigration is trying to have her sent back to Jamaica on a 1992 order. She originally came to Canada in Aug. 1981.
-
- Ballantyne v. The Queen, [2009] 3 C.N.L.R. 1
- The Appellant is an Indian under the Indian Act and is appealing the reassessments of his income in relation to s. 87 of the Indian Act._x000D_
-
- Ballantyne v. The Queen, [2009] 3 C.N.L.R. 1
- The Appellant is an Indian under the Indian Act and is appealing the reassessments of his income in relation to s. 87 of the Indian Act.
-
- Ballantyne v. The Queen, [2009] 3 C.N.L.R. 1
- The Appellant is an Indian under the Indian Act and is appealing the reassessments of his income in relation to s. 87 of the Indian Act.
-
- Ballantyne v. The Queen, [2009] 3 C.N.L.R. 1
- The Appellant is an Indian under the Indian Act and is appealing the reassessments of his income in relation to s. 87 of the Indian Act.
-
- Ballantyne v. The Queen, [2009] 3 C.N.L.R. 1
- The Appellant is an Indian under the Indian Act and is appealing the reassessments of his income in relation to s. 87 of the Indian Act.
-
- Ballantyne v. The Queen, [2009] 3 C.N.L.R. 1The appellant, an Indian as defined in s.2 of the Indian
- The Appellant is an Indian under the Indian Act and is appealing the reassessments of his income in relation to s. 87 of the Indian Act.
-
- Barry v. Garden River Band of Ojibways, [1997] 4 C.N.L.R. 28 (Ont. C.A.)
- The ppellants are appealing a decision which denied them an equal share of land claim settlement monies after being re-instated under Bill C-31
-
- Barry v. Garden River Band of Ojibways, [1997] 4 C.N.L.R. 28 (Ont. C.A.)
- The Appellants are appealing a decision which denied them an equal share of land claim settlement monies after being re-instated under Bill C-31
-
- Baxter v. Canada (Attorney General)
- Statement of Claim against the operators of Indian Residential Schools in Ontario.
-
- Bazley v. Curry
- This case is an appeal by the Children's Foundation about whether it is vicariously liable for the sexual abuses that its employee committed. The accused offender was employed by the non-profit organization. The Children's Foundation is appealing a ruling that held it vicariously responsible for its employees conduct, whether or not it was a non-profit organization.
-
- Bazley v. Curry
- This case is an appeal by the Children's Foundation about whether it is vicariously liable for the sexual abuses that its employee committed. The accused offender was employed by the non-profit organization. The Children's Foundation is appealing a ruling that held it vicariously responsible for its employees conduct, whether or not it was a non-profit organization.