-
-
R. v. Willison, 2005 BCPC 131
-
The issue in this case is whether the Métis Defendant has an aboriginal right under s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 to hunt for food. The Defendant was charged with unlawfully hunting deer out of season contrary to the British Columbia Wildlife Act. This document is the Proceedings at Trial transcript from November 9th and 10th, 2004.
-
-
R. v. Willison, 2005 BCPC 131
-
The issue in this case is whether the Métis Defendant has an aboriginal right under s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 to hunt for food. The Defendant was charged with unlawfully hunting deer out of season contrary to the British Columbia Wildlife Act. This document is the Proceedings at Trial transcript from January 12th, February 2nd and 3rd, March 22, and May 2, 2005.
-
-
Re Quebec Secession
-
Constitutional question as to whether Quebec has the legal right to separate from Canada. In this factum, the Intervener Grand Council of The Crees (Eeyou Estchee) argues that secession of Quebec from Canada is fundamentally incompatible with the existing constitutional and legal arrangements under the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. The Intervener also argues that Canada\\'s existing fiduciary obligations toward Aboriginal peoples imposes constraints on the unilateral secession of Quebec.
-
-
Re Quebec Secession
-
Constitutional question as to whether Quebec has the legal right to separate from Canada. This is the factum of the Intervener Makivik Corporation.
-
-
Re Quebec Secession
-
Constitutional question as to whether Quebec has the legal right to separate from Canada. This document is the Grand Council of the Crees' Reply to Factum of Amicus Curiae.
-
-
Re Quebec Secession
-
Constitutional question as to whether Quebec has the legal right to separate from Canada. This document is the Reply of the Attorney General of Canada to written responses of the Amicus Curiae.
-
-
Re Quebec Secession
-
Constitutional question as to whether Quebec has the legal right to separate from Canada. This document is the Grand Council of the Crees' Reply to written responses of the Attorney General of Canada and the Amicus Curiae to questions posed by the Supreme Court of Canada.
-
-
Re Quebec Secession
-
Constitutional question as to whether Quebec has the legal right to separate from Canada. This pleading deals with the interests of the Innu regarding Quebec\\'s secession.
-
-
Reilly v. Wachovich
-
Whether a Chief judge has jurisdiction to re-assign a judge based on bias regarding Aboriginal cases.
-
-
Reilly v. Wachowich
-
Whether a Chief Judge has jurisdiction to re-assign a judge based on bias regarding Aboriginal cases.