Legal Pleadings | ilclegalpleadings.usask.ca

: Calliou v. R.; Kelly Lake Cree Nation claim that they have never adhered to Treaty 8. Therefore, no Aboriginal rights or Indian title has been surrendered to the Crown. If Treaty 8 did apply to Kelly Lake Cree Nation then they are at least entitled to the benefits specified in the Treaty.

: Calliou v. R.; Kelly Lake Cree Nation claim that they have never adhered to Treaty 8. Therefore, no Aboriginal rights or Indian title has been surrendered to the Crown. If Treaty 8 did apply to Kelly Lake Cree Nation then there are at least entitled to the benefits specified in the treaty.

: Calliou v. R.; Kelly Lake Cree Nation claim that they have never adhered to Treaty 8. Therefore, no Aboriginal rights or Indian title has been surrendered to the Crown. If Treaty 8 did apply to Kelly Lake Cree Nation then there are at least entitled to the benefits specified in the treaty.

: Canadian Pacific Limited v. Paul, [1989] 1 C.N.L.R. 47 (S.C.C.); By virtue of a series of historical transactions, Canadian Pacific Ltd. held a right of way over the Woodstock Indian Reserve. In 1975, the Woodstock Indian Band barricaded the part of the railway that traversed the reserve. Canadian Pacific commenced a trespass action and sought an injunction to prevent the Band from interfering with the use of the right of way. The Band counterclaimed for a declaration that the right of way was held by the Crown for the use and benefit of the Band. This document is the factum of the Appellant.

: Canadian Pacific Limited v. Paul, [1989] 1 C.N.L.R. 47 (S.C.C.); By virtue of a series of historical transactions, Canadian Pacific Ltd. held a right of way over the Woodstock Indian Reserve. In 1975, the Woodstock Indian Band barricaded the part of the railway that traversed the reserve. Canadian Pacific commenced a trespass action and sought an injunction to prevent the Band from interfering with the use of the right of way. The Band counterclaimed for a declaration that the right of way was held by the Crown for the use and benefit of the band. This document is the factum of the Respondent Attorney General of Canada (defendant by counterclaim).

: Canadian Pacific Limited v. Paul, [1989] 1 C.N.L.R. 47 (S.C.C.); By virtue of a series of historical transactions, Canadian Pacific Ltd. held a right of way over the Woodstock Indian Reserve. In 1975, the Woodstock Indian Band barricaded the part of the railway that traversed the reserve. Canadian Pacific commenced a trespass action and sought an injunction to prevent the Band from interfering with the use of the right of way. The Band counterclaimed for a declaration that the right of way was held by the Crown for the use and benefit of the band. This document is the factum of the Respondents Chief Winston Paul et. al. (defendants - plaintiffs by counterclaim).

: Canadian Pacific Limited v. Paul, [1989] 1 C.N.L.R. 47 (S.C.C.); By virtue of a series of historical transactions, Canadian Pacific Ltd. held a right of way over the Woodstock Indian Reserve. In 1975, the Woodstock Indian Band barricaded the part of the railway that traversed the reserve. Canadian Pacific commenced a trespass action and sought an injunction to prevent the Band from interfering with the use of the right of way. The Band counterclaimed for a declaration that the right of way was held by the Crown for the use and benefit of the band. This document is the factum of the Intervener Attorney General of Ontario.

: Canadian Pacific Limited v. Paul, [1989] 1 C.N.L.R. 47 (S.C.C.); By virtue of a series of historical transactions, Canadian Pacific Ltd. held a right of way over the Woodstock Indian Reserve. In 1975, the Woodstock Indian Band barricaded the part of the railway that traversed the reserve. Canadian Pacific commenced a trespass action and sought an injunction to prevent the band from interfering with the use of the right of way. The Band counterclaimed for a declaration that the right of way was held by the Crown for the use and benefit of the Band. This document is the factum of the Respondent New Brunswick Railway Company (defendant by counterclaim).

: Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Matsqui Indian Band, [1995] 2 C.N.L.R. 92 (S.C.C.), aff’g [1994] 1 C.N.L.R.; This case deals with whether the railway company had to pay taxes to the Matsqui First Nation even though there was a right of way granted to the rail company. It also deals with whether the railway company\\'s claim to fee simple ownership in the land was valid.

: Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Matsqui Indian Band, [1995] 2 C.N.L.R. 92 (S.C.C.), aff’g [1994] 1 C.N.L.R.; This case deals with whether the railway company had to pay taxes to the Matsqui First Nation even though there was a right of way granted to the rail company. It also deals with whether the railway company\\'s claim to fee simple ownership in the land was valid. (This is the application record of the CNR Vol.2)

: Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Matsqui Indian Band, [1995] 2 C.N.L.R. 92 (S.C.C.), aff’g [1994] 1 C.N.L.R.; This case deals with whether the railway company had to pay taxes to the Matsqui First Nation even though there was a right of way granted to the rail company. It also deals with whether the railway company\\'s claim to fee simple ownership in the land was valid. (This is a supplementary application record).

: Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Matsqui Indian Band, [1995] 2 C.N.L.R. 92 (S.C.C.), aff’g [1994] 1 C.N.L.R.; This case deals with whether the railway company had to pay taxes to the Matsqui First Nation even though there was a right of way granted to the rail company. It also deals with whether the railway company\\'s claim to fee simple ownership in the land was valid. (This is part of Vol. 2 of the Application Record for CNR).