Legal Pleadings | ilclegalpleadings.usask.ca

: Sawridge Band v. Canada, [1995] 4 C.N.L.R. 121 (F.C.T.D.); Appeal to the Federal Court on the grounds of bias by the Judge. The issue of control of Band membership is the basis of the case. The Band alleges a conflict arises between the Indian Act and sec. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Band argued that reinstating C-31 women was a violation of its control of membership.

: Sawridge Band v. Canada, [1995] 4 C.N.L.R. 121 (F.C.T.D.); Appeal to the Federal Court on the grounds of bias by the Judge. The issue of control of Band membership is the basis of the case. The Band alleges a conflict arises between the Indian Act and sec. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Band argued that reinstating C-31 women was a violation of its control of membership.

: Sawridge Band v. Canada, [1995] 4 C.N.L.R. 121 (F.C.T.D.); The issue of control of Band membership is the basis of the case. The Band alleges a conflict arises between the Indian Act and sec. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Band argued that reinstating C-31 women was a violation of its control of membership. (The exact date of this submission is not listed in this document.)

: Sheard and Weston v. Chippewas of Rama First Nation Band Council, [1997] 2 C.N.L.R. 182 (F.C.T.D.); Whether a Band resolution to remove Brent Weston from the reserve is valid.

: Sheard and Weston v. Chippewas of Rama First Nation Band Council, [1997] 2 C.N.L.R. 182 (F.C.T.D.); Whether a Band Council resolution to remove Brent Weston from the reserve is valid.

: Sheard and Weston v. Chippewas of Rama First Nation Band Council, [1997] 2 C.N.L.R. 182 (F.C.T.D.); Whether a Band Council Resolution to remove Brent Weston from the reserve is valid.

: Sheard and Weston v. Chippewas of Rama First Nation Band Council, [1997] 2 C.N.L.R. 182 (F.C.T.D.); Whether a Band Council Resolution to remove Brent Weston from the reserve is valid.

: Simon v. R., [1986] 1 C.N.L.R. 153 (S.C.C.), rev'g [1982] 1 C.N.L.R. 118 (N.S.C.A.); The accused, a Mi\\'kmaq Indian, was charged with unlawful possession of a shot-gun cartridge and unlawful possession of a rifle during closed season under the Nova Scotia Lands and Forests Act. The accused argued that he had a treaty right to possess the cartridge and shotgun. Accordingly, he argued that the provincial legislation did not apply to him because of section 88 of the Indian Act. Section 88 provides that provincial laws of general application apply to Indians \\\subject to the terms of any treaty.\\\" The validity of the alleged treaty was also addressed. This document is the factum of the Appellant."

: Simon v. R., [1986] 1 C.N.L.R. 153 (S.C.C.), rev'g [1982] 1 C.N.L.R. 118 (N.S.C.A.); The accused, a Mi\\'kmaq Indian, was charged with unlawful possession of a shot-gun cartridge and unlawful possession of a rifle during closed season under the Nova Scotia Lands and Forests Act. The accused argued that he had a treaty right to possess the cartridge and shotgun. Accordingly, he argued that the provincial legislation did not apply to him because of section 88 of the Indian Act. Section 88 provides that provincial laws of general application apply to Indians \\\subject to the terms of any treaty.\\\" The validity of the alleged treaty was also addressed. This document is the factum of the Respondent."

: Simon v. R., [1986] 1 C.N.L.R. 153 (S.C.C.), rev'g [1982] 1 C.N.L.R. 118 (N.S.C.A.); The accused, a Mi\\'kmaq Indian, was charged with unlawful possession of a shot-gun cartridge and unlawful possession of a rifle during closed season under the Nova Scotia Lands and Forests Act. The accused argued that he had a treaty right to possess the cartridge and shotgun. Accordingly, he argued that the provincial legislation did not apply to him because of section 88 of the Indian Act. Section 88 provides that provincial laws of general application apply to Indians \\\subject to the terms of any treaty.\\\" The validity of the alleged treaty was also addressed. This document is the factum of the Intervener Attorney General of New Brunswick."

: Simon v. R., [1986] 1 C.N.L.R. 153 (S.C.C.), rev'g [1982] 1 C.N.L.R. 118 (N.S.C.A.); The accused, a Mi\\'kmaq Indian, was charged with unlawful possession of a shot-gun cartridge and unlawful possession of a rifle during closed season under the Nova Scotia Lands and Forests Act. The accused argued that he had a treaty right to possess the cartridge and shotgun. Accordingly, he argued that the provincial legislation did not apply to him because of section 88 of the Indian Act. Section 88 provides that provincial laws of general application apply to Indians \\\subject to the terms of any treaty.\\\" The validity of the alleged treaty was also addressed. This document is the factum of the Intervener Attorney General of Canada."

: Simon v. R., [1986] 1 C.N.L.R. 153 (S.C.C.), rev'g [1982] 1 C.N.L.R. 118 (N.S.C.A.); The accused, a Mi\\'kmaq Indian, was charged with unlawful possession of a shot-gun cartridge and unlawful possession of a rifle during closed season under the Nova Scotia Lands and Forests Act. The accused argued that he had a treaty right to possess the cartridge and shotgun. Accordingly, he argued that the provincial legislation did not apply to him because of section 88 of the Indian Act. Section 88 provides that provincial laws of general application apply to Indians \\\subject to the terms of any treaty.\\\" The validity of the alleged treaty was also addressed. This document is the factum of the intervener Attorney General of Ontario."