Legal Pleadings
-
- Blueberry River Indian Band v. Canada (Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development), [1996
- Issue is whether there is a fiduciary relationship between the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Blueberry River Indian Band regarding lands that were relegated to the Band that was created in 1977.
-
- Blueberry River Indian Band v. Canada (Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development), [1996
- Issue is whether there is a fiduciary relationship between the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Blueberry River Indian Band regarding lands that were relegated to the Band that was created in 1977.
-
- Blueberry River Indian Band v. Canada (Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development), [1996
- The Beaver Band surrendered its reserve land along with the mineral rights to the Crown. The Crown then transferred the land to the Director of the Veterans' Land Act (DVLA). The DVLA obtained the mineral rights \by inadvertence\" because they had not been reserved in the transfer from the Crown to the DVLA. The land was then sold to war veterans and oil and gas was later discovered. The band claimed damages against the Crown for allowing it to make an improvident surrender and for disposing of the land under its true value. The band also claimed damages against the Crown for permitting the transfer of the mineral rights to the DVLA and then to the veterans. This document is the factum of the Intervener."
-
- Blueberry River Indian Band v. Canada (Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development), [1996
- Issue is whether there is a fiduciary relationship between the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Blueberry River Indian Band regarding lands that were relegated to the Band that was created in 1977.
-
- British Columbia (Minister of Forests) v. Okanagan Indian Band, [2005] 3 C.N.L.R. 35
- At issue in this case is whether a Stop Work Order regarding logging can affect the Aboriginal title or rights of Indians in B.C.
-
- British Columbia (Minister of Forests) v. Okanagan Indian Band, [2005] 3 C.N.L.R. 35
- At issue in this case is whether a Stop Work Order regarding logging can affect the Aboriginal title or rights of Indians in B.C.
-
- British Columbia (Minister of Forests) v. Okanagan Indian Band, [2005] 3 C.N.L.R. 35
- At issue in this case is whether a Stop Work Order regarding logging can affect the Aboriginal title or rights of Indians in B.C.
-
- British Columbia (Minister of Forests) v. Okanagan Indian Band, [2005] 3 C.N.L.R. 35
- At issue in this case is whether a Stop Work Order regarding logging can affect the Aboriginal title or rights of Indians in B.C.
-
- Burns Lake Native Logging Ltd. (Re), [2006] 2 C.N.L.R. 1 (C.I.R.B.)
- The British Columbia Labour Relations Board filed a motion regarding its representation of an employee of Burns Lake Native Logging Ltd. and the jurisdiction Canada Industrial Relations Board in this matter.
-
- C.A., C.H., L.K. and M.D. v. R. and Critchley
- Factum of the Respondents in an appeal to a decision that found the Provincial Crown was vicariously liable for former child residents that were abused in an institution that the children were placed by the province.
-
- Calder et al. v. Attorney General of British Columbia, [1973] S.C.R. 313
- The Appellant members of the Nishga Nation sued for a declaration that their Aboriginal title was never lawfully extinguished. This document is the Factum of the Appellant.
-
- Calder et al. v. Attorney General of British Columbia, [1973] S.C.R. 313
- The Appellant members of the Nishga Nation sued for a declaration that their Aboriginal title was never lawfully extinguished. This document is the Factum of the Respondent Attorney General of British Columbia.