Legal Pleadings | ilclegalpleadings.usask.ca

: Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2003] 1 C.N.L.R. 141 (S.C.C.); Two bands of the Laich-kwil-tach First Nation claimed one another\\'s reserve lands in this case. The reserves have been in the possession of the respective bands since the 19th century. Both bands argued that they would possess both reserves in the absence of alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the federal Crown. The bands sought declarations against one another and equitable compensation from the federal Crown. This document is the factum of the Interveners Gitanmaax Indian Band, Kispiox Indian Band, and Glen Vowell Indian Band.

: Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2003] 1 C.N.L.R. 141 (S.C.C.); Two bands of the Laich-kwil-tach First Nation claimed one another\\'s reserve lands in this case. The reserves have been in the possession of the respective bands since the 19th century. Both bands argued that they would possess both reserves in the absence of alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the federal Crown. The bands sought declarations against one another and equitable compensation from the federal Crown. This document is the AMENDED factum of the Interveners Gitanmaax Indian Band, Kispiox Indian Band, and Glen Vowell Indian Band (amended pursuant to order of the court).

: Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2003] 1 C.N.L.R. 141 (S.C.C.); Two bands of the Laich-kwil-tach First Nation claimed one another\\'s reserve lands in this case. The reserves have been in the possession of the respective bands since the 19th century. Both bands argued that they would possess both reserves in the absence of alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the federal Crown. The bands sought declarations against one another and equitable compensation from the federal Crown. This document is the factum of the Appellants Roy Anthony Roberts et. al., suing on their own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the Wewaykum Indian Band (also known as the Campbell River Indian Band).

: Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2003] 1 C.N.L.R. 141 (S.C.C.); Two bands of the Laich-kwil-tach First Nation claimed one another's reserve lands in this case. The reserves have been in the possession of the respective bands since the 19th century. Both bands argued that they would possess both reserves in the absence of alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the federal Crown. The bands sought declarations against one another and equitable compensation from the federal Crown. This document is the factum of Ralph Dick et. al., suing on their own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the Wewaikai Indian Band (also known as the Cape Mudge Indian Band)

: Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2003] 1 C.N.L.R. 141 (S.C.C.); Two bands of the Laich-kwil-tach First Nation claimed one another's reserve lands in this case. The reserves have been in the possession of the respective bands since the 19th century. Both bands argued that they would possess both reserves in the absence of alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the federal Crown. The bands sought declarations against one another and equitable compensation from the federal Crown. This document is the factum of Ralph Dick et. al., suing on their own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the Wewaikai Indian Band (also known as the Cape Mudge Indian Band) responding to the factum of the Appellants Roy Anthony Roberts et. al. and the Wewaykum Indian Band.

: Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2003] 1 C.N.L.R. 141 (S.C.C.); Two bands of the Laich-kwil-tach First Nation claimed one another\\'s reserve lands in this case. The reserves have been in the possession of the respective bands since the 19th century. Both bands argued that they would possess both reserves in the absence of alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the federal Crown. The bands sought declarations against one another and equitable compensation from the federal Crown. This document is the factum of the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, responding to the Appeal of the Wewaykum Indian Band (a.k.a. Campbell River Indian Band).

: Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2003] 1 C.N.L.R. 141 (S.C.C.); Two bands of the Laich-kwil-tach First Nation claimed one another\\'s reserve lands in this case. The reserves have been in the possession of the respective bands since the 19th century. Both bands argued that they would possess both reserves in the absence of alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the federal Crown. The bands sought declarations against one another and equitable compensation from the federal Crown. This document is the factum of the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, responding to the Appeal of the Wewaikai Indian Band (a.k.a. Cape Mudge Indian Band).

: Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2003] 1 C.N.L.R. 141 (S.C.C.); Two bands of the Laich-kwil-tach First Nation claimed one another\\'s reserve lands in this case. The reserves have been in the possession of the respective bands since the 19th century. Both bands argued that they would possess both reserves in the absence of alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the federal Crown. The bands sought declarations against one another and equitable compensation from the federal Crown. This document is the factum of the Intervener Attorney General of British Columbia.

: Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2003] 1 C.N.L.R. 141 (S.C.C.); Two bands of the Laich-kwil-tach First Nation claimed one another\\'s reserve lands in this case. The reserves have been in the possession of the respective bands since the 19th century. Both bands argued that they would possess both reserves in the absence of alleged breaches of fiduciary duty by the federal Crown. The bands sought declarations against one another and equitable compensation from the federal Crown. This document is the factum of the Intervener Attorney General of Ontario.