Legal Pleadings
-
- R. v. Badger, [1996] 2 C.N.L.R. 77 (S.C.C.), rev’g in part [1993] 3 C.N.L.R. 143 (Alta. C.A.).
- This is the Department of Justice factum where it is argued that the NRTA modified the hunting rights of Treaty 8. It is further argued that the 3 men charged with hunting offences are not protected by treaty for hunting on lands other than Crown lands.
-
- R. v. Badger, [1996] 2 C.N.L.R. 77 (S.C.C.), rev’g in part [1993] 3 C.N.L.R. 143 (Alta. C.A.).
- It is argued that the 3 men charged with hunting offences are not protected by treaty for hunting on lands other than Crown lands because of modifications to treaty rights through the NRTA.
-
- R. v. Badger, [1996] 2 C.N.L.R. 77 (S.C.C.), rev’g in part [1993] 3 C.N.L.R. 143 (Alta. C.A.).
- It is argued that the 3 men charged with hunting offences are not protected by treaty for hunting on lands other than Crown lands because of modifications to treaty rights through the NRTA.
-
- R. v. Bernard, [2002] 3 C.N.L.R. 141 (N.B.Q.B.), aff’g [2000] 3 C.N.L.R. 184 (N.B. Prov. Ct.)
- Question as to whether Mr. Bernard had a Treaty Right or Aboriginal title to the Sevogle area to harvest logs.
-
- R. v. Bernard, [2002] 3 C.N.L.R. 141 (N.B.Q.B.), aff’g [2000] 3 C.N.L.R. 184 (N.B. Prov. Ct.)
- Question as to whether Mr. Bernard had a Treaty Right or Aboriginal title to the Sevogle area to harvest logs.
-
- R. v. Bernard, [2002] 3 C.N.L.R. 141 (N.B.Q.B.), aff’g [2000] 3 C.N.L.R. 184 (N.B. Prov. Ct.)
- Question as to whether Mr. Bernard had a Treaty Right or Aboriginal title to the Sevogle area to harvest logs.
-
- R. v. Blais, [2001] 3 C.N.L.R. 187 (Man. C.A.)
- Is Mr. Blais, a Métis person, recognized as an Indian under paragraph 13 of the NRTA; therefore not in violation of the Manitoba Wildlife Act?
-
- R. v. Blais, [2001] 3 C.N.L.R. 187 (Man. C.A.)
- Is Mr. Blais, a Métis person, recognized as an Indian under paragraph 13 of the NRTA; therefore not in violation of the Manitoba Wildlife Act?
-
- R. v. Blais, [2001] 3 C.N.L.R. 187 (Man. C.A.),
- Is Mr. Blais, a Métis person, recognized as an Indian under paragraph 13 of the NRTA; therefore not in violation of the Manitoba Wildlife Act?
-
- R. v. Blais, [2001] 3 C.N.L.R. 187 (Man. C.A.), aff’g [1998] 4 C.N.L.R. 103 (Man. Q.B.)
- Whether a Métis person is considered to be an Indian under s. 13 of the NRTA 1930 regarding an Aboriginal right to hunt in Manitoba.
-
- R. v. Blais, [2001] 3 C.N.L.R. 187 (Man. C.A.), aff’g [1998] 4 C.N.L.R. 103 (Man. Q.B.)
- Whether a Métis person is considered to be an Indian under s. 13 of the NRTA 1930 regarding an Aboriginal right to hunt in Manitoba.
-
- R. v. Blais, [2001] 3 C.N.L.R. 187 (Man. C.A.), aff’g [1998] 4 C.N.L.R. 103 (Man. Q.B.)
- Whether a Métis person is considered to be an Indian under s. 13 of the NRTA 1930 regarding an Aboriginal right to hunt in Manitoba.