Legal Pleadings

Delgammukw v. British Columbia, [1998] 1 C.N.L.R. 14 (S.C.C.), rev’g in part [1993] 5 C.N.L.R. 1
Delgammukw v. British Columbia, [1998] 1 C.N.L.R. 14 (S.C.C.), rev’g in part [1993] 5 C.N.L.R. 1
The Gitksan and Wet\\'suwet\\'en people make a claim for Aboriginal rights, Aboriginal title and governing rights over their traditional lands. (Date of this documnet is an estimate.)
Delgammukw v. British Columbia, [1998] 1 C.N.L.R. 14 (S.C.C.), rev’g in part [1993] 5 C.N.L.R. 1
Delgammukw v. British Columbia, [1998] 1 C.N.L.R. 14 (S.C.C.), rev’g in part [1993] 5 C.N.L.R. 1
The Gitksan and Wet\\'suwet\\'en peoples make a claim for Aboriginal rights, Aboriginal title and governing rights over their traditional lands.
Delgammukw v. British Columbia, [1998] 1 C.N.L.R. 14 (S.C.C.), rev’g in part [1993] 5 C.N.L.R. 1
Delgammukw v. British Columbia, [1998] 1 C.N.L.R. 14 (S.C.C.), rev’g in part [1993] 5 C.N.L.R. 1
The Gitksan and Wet\\'suwet\\'en people make a claim for Aboriginal rights, Aboriginal title and governing rights over their traditional lands.
Delgammukw v. British Columbia, [1998] 1 C.N.L.R. 14 (S.C.C.), rev’g in part [1993] 5 C.N.L.R. 1 (B.
Delgammukw v. British Columbia, [1998] 1 C.N.L.R. 14 (S.C.C.), rev’g in part [1993] 5 C.N.L.R. 1 (B.
Question of Aboriginal title for the Gikstan and Wet'suwet'en over traditionally held land that has never been surrendered to the Crown.
Doe v. Canada
Doe v. Canada
A residential school case which deals with whether the Roman Catholic Church can be named as an entity in law to be held liable for abuse.
Dumont v. Canada (A.G.), [1990] 2 C.N.L.R. 19 (S.C.C.), rev'g [1988] 3 C.N.L.R. 39 (Man. C.A.)
Dumont v. Canada (A.G.), [1990] 2 C.N.L.R. 19 (S.C.C.), rev'g [1988] 3 C.N.L.R. 39 (Man. C.A.)
The plaintiffs were Metis and sued based on the government's failure to live up to the promises made regarding the allocation of Land under the Manitoba Act, 1870.
Dumont v. Canada (A.G.), [1990] 2 C.N.L.R. 19 (S.C.C.), rev'g [1988] 3 C.N.L.R. 39 (Man. C.A.)
Dumont v. Canada (A.G.), [1990] 2 C.N.L.R. 19 (S.C.C.), rev'g [1988] 3 C.N.L.R. 39 (Man. C.A.)
The plaintiffs were Metis and sued based on the government's failure to live up to the promises made regarding the allocation of Land under the Manitoba Act, 1870.
Dumont v. Canada (A.G.), [1990] 2 C.N.L.R. 19 (S.C.C.), rev'g [1988] 3 C.N.L.R. 39 (Man. C.A.)
Dumont v. Canada (A.G.), [1990] 2 C.N.L.R. 19 (S.C.C.), rev'g [1988] 3 C.N.L.R. 39 (Man. C.A.)
Metis claimants argue that Canada and Manitoba have violated the terms of the Manitoba Act and its promises of a land base.
Eastmain Band v. Robinson, [1992] 1 C.N.L.R. 90 (F.C.T.D.)
Eastmain Band v. Robinson, [1992] 1 C.N.L.R. 90 (F.C.T.D.)
The issue in this case was based upon the legal status of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. Does the JBANQA ignore statutory and constitutional rights of the First Nations involved with decisions made regarding Aboriginal peoples affected by the agreement. (Volume II)
Eastmain Band v. Robinson, [1992] 1 C.N.L.R. 90 (F.C.T.D.)
Eastmain Band v. Robinson, [1992] 1 C.N.L.R. 90 (F.C.T.D.)
The issue in this case was based upon the legal status of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. Does the JBANQA ignore statutory and constitutional rights of the First Nations involved with decisions made regarding Aboriginal peoples affected by the agreement? (Volume I)
Elizabeth Metis Settlement v. Transwest Energy
Elizabeth Metis Settlement v. Transwest Energy
Decision on the jurisdiction of the Existing Leases Land Access Panel (ELLAP) over any issues raised by the Metis settlement.
Elizabeth Metis Settlement v. Transwest Energy
Elizabeth Metis Settlement v. Transwest Energy
Decision on the jurisdiction of the Existing Leases Land Access Panel (ELLAP) over any issues raised by the Métis settlement.